Imagine a scenario where Ukraine could strike deep into Russian territory, potentially turning the tide of the conflict. That scenario might be closer than you think, as former President Donald Trump has hinted at a major shift in his approach to the Russia-Ukraine war: the possible delivery of long-range Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv.
While aboard Air Force One, Trump told reporters that he might consider sending Ukraine these powerful missiles if Moscow doesn’t move toward settling the conflict. "I might say, 'Look: if this war is not going to get settled, I’m going to send them Tomahawks,'" Trump stated. He emphasized the Tomahawk's offensive capabilities, adding, "The Tomahawk is an incredible weapon, very offensive weapon. And honestly, Russia does not need that."
But here's where it gets controversial... Trump's remarks suggest a potential escalation, a move that could dramatically alter the dynamics of the war. He even mentioned discussing the possibility of sending Tomahawks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a recent conversation.
Trump didn't commit outright, adding "I might tell them that if the war is not settled -- that we may very well." He further stated, "We may not, but we may do it. I think it’s appropriate to bring up.”
Zelenskyy seems eager to receive these weapons. In an interview with Fox News Channel, when asked whether Trump had approved the Tomahawks, Zelenskyy responded, "we work on it." He further added, "I’m waiting for president to yes... Of course we count on such decisions, but we will see. We will see.” Zelenskyy also stated that he was in talks with U.S. officials about the possible provision of various long-range precision strike weapons, including Tomahawks and more ATACMS tactical ballistic missiles.
And this is the part most people miss... The implications of this potential decision are far-reaching. Tomahawk missiles, with their long range and precision-strike capabilities, would allow Ukraine to target critical infrastructure and military assets deep within Russia. This could significantly increase the pressure on Putin's government to negotiate a peaceful resolution. However, it also carries the risk of escalating the conflict and potentially drawing the U.S. and NATO into a more direct confrontation with Russia.
Russia has already expressed strong opposition to the idea of Ukraine receiving Tomahawk missiles. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that "the topic of Tomahawks is of extreme concern." Putin himself has previously warned that such a move would severely damage relations between Moscow and Washington. This raises the question: Is the potential strategic advantage worth the risk of further inflaming tensions with Russia?
Trump's willingness to consider sending Tomahawks represents a notable shift in his stance on the war. Previously, he had called for Kyiv to make concessions to end the conflict. However, in recent weeks, he has taken a tougher line with Putin, even suggesting that Ukraine could win back all the territory lost to Russia. This shift may be driven by frustration with Russia's refusal to engage in direct talks with Zelenskyy about resolving the conflict.
As Trump himself stated, "I really think Putin would look great if he got this settled," and that "It’s not going to be good for him" if not. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to send Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine rests with Trump. It's a decision that will have profound consequences for the future of the war and for international relations.
What do you think? Should the U.S. provide Ukraine with Tomahawk missiles, even if it risks escalating the conflict with Russia? Or are there other, less risky ways to pressure Putin to negotiate a peaceful resolution? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
